MT5IndicesVALIDATED

USTECH Index Sniper - US Tech M1 Pending-Stop Scalper

USTECH Index Sniper is a seller-provided scalper for the US Tech (Nasdaq 100) index on MetaTrader 5 that trades trend continuation with ONE precise pending order at a time. After every closed M1 bar it looks for two things at once: an M5 EMA(50) trend (price on the right side of a rising or falling EMA) and a fresh 3-candle fair value gap of at least 8 pips in the same direction. When both agree it places a single buy-stop or sell-stop just beyond the high/low of the last 5 M1 bars (30 points of buffer), with a fixed stop loss and take profit, and cancels the order if it is not triggered within 3 minutes. There is never more than one position or pending order, with a 30-second cooldown between orders. Open trades are managed on every tick by break-even and trailing rules. It only trades inside the London and New York sessions and only when the spread is acceptable. Optional filters in the code (CVD pressure proxy, entropy/volatility regime, tick order-flow) were switched OFF in the tested run. The download contains the licence-protected compiled EA, the exact input set used in the backtest and an install guide. AT24-computed evidence (real MT5 Strategy Tester .html export, Exness demo server, M1, first trade 2025-06-16, last trade 2026-09-10, 14,893 trades; AT24 recomputed the net profit and trade count from the report's own deals list and both match the report exactly): - Tester result: net profit 36,680,484 on a 100,000 USD deposit with RISK-BASED lot sizing (2% of equity per trade, so the lot grew from 0.4 to 20.0 lots during the run), profit factor 1.76 as printed by the report (AT24's trade-level recomputation gives 2.10 because the two count commission differently). This headline is the result of compounding on the Exness USTEC_x100 symbol (contract size 100) - it is NOT a realistic expectation for a live account. - 94.6% of trades were net winners (the report prints 97.4% before commission), but the average losing trade was about 8 times the average winner (about -41,275 vs +4,969 per trade); the largest single loss was about 731,000, the longest winning streak 200 trades and the longest losing streak 3. - Maximum drawdown on closed trades (balance) 11.28%, matching the tester's own balance drawdown. The tester report also prints a 100% EQUITY drawdown which AT24 could not reproduce or explain. AT24 therefore rebuilt the intraday equity curve from real Exness 15-minute candles of USTEC_x100 pulled from an Exness demo terminal (29,280 bars covering the whole period; the only gaps are market holidays): maximum intraday drawdown 11.46%, longest drawdown about 250 days (equity was below its late-2025 peak for 62% of the period and has not recovered it). A 15-minute curve cannot see price swings inside a trade shorter than one bar (average trade about 3 minutes), so real intratrade drawdown can be larger. - Very uneven in time: June-December 2025 made +40.8 million (the best month, November 2025, was 38.1% of the total); January-September 2026 was net NEGATIVE (-4.1 million) with 6 losing months out of 9. Recent behaviour of the tested settings is weaker than the headline suggests. - Position profile: 8,312 long / 6,581 short trades; all four volatility/trend regimes are represented (profit came in every regime). The automated validation suite passed its sample-size, out-of-sample, walk-forward, temporal-stability, regime-coverage and performance-distribution checks; parameter sensitivity is INCONCLUSIVE (one parameter set, one instrument). Risk analysis is COMPLETE, so the Trust State is VALIDATED: AT24's checks of the evidence passed. VALIDATED means the evidence is verified and consistent - it is not a promise of profit, and it does not remove the warnings in this text (especially the 2026 result and the compounding). Read before buying - The evidence comes from the seller's own Strategy Tester report, not from an AT24-run backtest of this exact file. AT24 recomputed every figure from the report's own trade list and rebuilt the equity path from real candles, but it did not re-execute the EA. - The test ran on the Exness symbol USTEC_x100 (Exness demo server, Zero-account index group "Idx_Enlarge": contract size 100, maximum 20 lots, commission instead of spread). On that symbol one lot earned or lost 100 USD per index point (checked on the first trade), far more than a normal index CFD, so the lot sizes, profits and drawdowns in the report cannot be copied to other brokers or account types. Only the percentage-risk sizing carries over; spread, slippage, commission and lot limits will differ. The symbol's data starts on 2025-06-15, so although the test window began 2025-01-01 the first trade is on 2025-06-16. - Name: the Strategy Tester report carries the EA's earlier working name. The seller states that the file was only renamed to "USTECH Index Sniper" for this listing (order comments and texts renamed) with the trading logic unchanged; AT24 compared the renamed source with the seller's file and the trading code is identical, but the link to the earlier test run is the seller's statement and cannot be verified from the files. - The tested settings are NOT the EA's defaults: the run used a 2% risk per trade, StopLossPips=5000 and TakeProfitPips=11000 (with PipSize=0.01 that is a 50 and 110 price-unit move), point-based break-even and trailing, and the CVD / regime / order-flow filters OFF. The built-in defaults are different (for example 0.5% risk, StopLossPips=50, TakeProfitPips=100, all filters ON). Load the included tested-settings file to reproduce the evidence - but lower the risk for live use; other settings have NOT been backtested. - History quality of the run was 43% real ticks; spread and swap models are not disclosed by the report (a commission of 25 USD per 0.4 lot is visible in the deals). - Session hours are BROKER SERVER time and index symbol names differ by broker (USTEC / NAS100 / US100 ...); check your broker's offset, digits and PipSize first. - No live or demo results are claimed for this EA. Past backtest performance is not a guarantee of future results; trading leveraged products is risky. Test on a demo account with a small risk setting first; this is not financial advice.

Listed by Algotraders24.ai · ✓ Identity verified